Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Max vs Grok 4.6
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 21/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 39/100 | 26/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.50/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$7.50/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
38K
57K
Completed sessions
86,545
131,979
Token share
0%
0.01%
Tokens
27B-90%
65B+333%
SEP 1OCT 26
SEP 1OCT 26
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
46.6%986 user-weeks
38.6%3K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba Mini