Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 69/100 | 25/100 | 70/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | 44/100 | 100/100 | 57/100 | 92/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.43/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$0.87/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.0036/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
108K
135K
Completed sessions
1,187,068
673,642
Token share
0.08%
0.24%
Tokens
896B+100%
2.8T+100%
SEP 1OCT 26
SEP 1OCT 26
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
59.6%3.2K user-weeks
64.5%5.6K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.6-Pro·Jamba Mini