Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 56/100 | 100/100 | 68/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 90/100 | 79/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.002/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
52K
1.6M
Completed sessions
771,978
373,963,633
Token share
0.18%
20.6%
Tokens
2.1T+100%
242T+100%
SEP 1OCT 26
SEP 1OCT 26
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
69.3%57K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba Mini