Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	68/100	81/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Beam 1.0 501B A23B	50/100	88/100	58/100	92/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.10/ 1M

$0.24/ 1M

Output

$0.60/ 1M

$0.98/ 1M

Cached input

$0.003/ 1M

$0.04/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

52K

169K

Completed sessions

771,978

3,734,216

Token share

0.18%

0.76%

Tokens

2.1T+100%

9T+100%

SEP 1OCT 26

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

63.3%983 user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.