Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Muse Spark 1.2Meta
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Muse Spark 1.2 | 0/100 | 41/100 | 30/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.25/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$4.25/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.7M
0
Completed sessions
98,635,641
11
Token share
35.9%
0%
Tokens
423T+100%
0-100%
SEP 1OCT 26
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.2 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.2·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.2 vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.2·Jamba Mini