Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 64/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 68/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.17/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$0.70/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.005/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.7M
930K
Completed sessions
98,475,277
125,533,134
Token share
35.8%
15.9%
Tokens
422T+100%
188T+100%
SEP 1OCT 26
SEP 1OCT 26
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
75.4%11K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Mini