Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 61/100 | 63/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.90/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.7M
0
Completed sessions
98,635,641
0
Token share
35.9%
0%
Tokens
423T+100%
00%
SEP 1OCT 26
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B·Jamba Mini