Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- GPT-6 LunaOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 47/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 45/100 | 70/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.70/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$1.40/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.07/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
437K
715K
Completed sessions
1,422,252
5,773,161
Token share
0.47%
0.33%
Tokens
5.5T-82%
3.9T+100%
SEP 1OCT 26
SEP 1OCT 26
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
55%36K user-weeks
62.4%10K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-6 Luna vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-6 Luna·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-6 Luna vs Jamba MiniGPT-6 Luna·Jamba Mini