Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3 vs flint-40b

MiniMax-M3MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
flint-40bRecursiveHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiniMax-M3	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	83/100	59/100	92/100	50/100	21/100
flint-40b	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder

Overview

Author

MiniMax

Recursive

Context length

Unknown

Reasoning

True

Unknown

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Unknown

Output modalities

Text

Unknown

Providers

MiniMax

Recursive

Pricing

Input

$0.23/ 1M

Unknown

Output

$0.96/ 1M

Unknown

Cached input

$0.05/ 1M

Unknown

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

202K

27K

Completed sessions

1,683,758

316,734

Token share

0.18%

0.02%

Tokens

2.1T-57%

196B+100%

SEP 1OCT 26

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

60.2%12K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeflint-40b vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructflint-40bDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMiniMax-M3 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3Jamba Mini Related comparisonflint-40b vs Jamba Miniflint-40bJamba Mini