Compare AI models: GPT-5 Nano vs Grok 4.6
- GPT-5 NanoOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 73/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 39/100 | 24/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
400K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.05/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.40/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.005/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
10K
57K
Completed sessions
82,240
131,979
Token share
0%
0.01%
Tokens
5.9B+110%
65B+333%
SEP 1OCT 26
SEP 1OCT 26
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
38.6%3K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGPT-5 Nano vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5 Nano·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGPT-5 Nano vs Jamba MiniGPT-5 Nano·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba Mini