Compare AI models: Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5.1

Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Grok 4.6	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	39/100	25/100	75/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
GLM-5.1	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	88/100	33/100	46/100	0/100	45/100

Overview

Author

xAI

Zhipu

Context length

500K

200K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

xAI

Zhipu

Pricing

Input

$2.00/ 1M

$0.90/ 1M

Output

$6.00/ 1M

$3.59/ 1M

Cached input

$0.50/ 1M

$0.19/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

57K

40K

Completed sessions

131,979

102,286

Token share

0.01%

Tokens

65B+333%

60B-79%

SEP 1OCT 26

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

38.6%3K user-weeks

51.1%1.4K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGLM-5.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.1Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6Jamba Mini Related comparisonGLM-5.1 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.1Jamba Mini