Compare AI models: Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Grok 4.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	71/100	24/100	75/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.5-Pro	14/100	71/100	57/100	92/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

xAI

Xiaomi

Context length

500K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Pdf

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

xAI

Xiaomi

Pricing

Input

$2.00/ 1M

$0.43/ 1M

Output

$6.00/ 1M

$0.87/ 1M

Cached input

$0.50/ 1M

$0.0036/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

53K

81K

Completed sessions

129,779

356,855

Token share

0.01%

0.06%

Tokens

68B+100%

732B-66%

SEP 1OCT 26

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

42.9%1.6K user-weeks

59.6%3.6K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7Jamba Mini Related comparisonMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5-ProJamba Mini